Source QC
Trace originals, preserve context, and mark what a record can—and cannot—establish.
Global QC network / public read
Human-led quality controlOpen call · Every region · Every language
Global quality-control community · human signal archive
Check the signal.
Protect the record.
Bring another human.
A public working archive and coordination layer for quality controllers across cultures, disciplines, and time zones. Read publicly. Join deliberately. Keep the final judgment human.
Open global call
Every corner of the internet needs a human who checks.
A QC is anyone willing to slow down, separate evidence from inference, preserve uncertainty, and let the record change their mind. No credential, country, discipline, or belief system owns that responsibility.
Method QC
Stress-test protocols, failure conditions, controls, and claims of replication.
Language QC
Carry meaning across languages without laundering certainty or erasing local context.
Regional QC
Notice what distant institutions miss and route grounded knowledge into the record.
Connected record set
Theory, program design, and institutional decision.
These files become useful when read together. Their presence in a government archive establishes institutional attention—not the truth of every claim inside.
File 0011991
Contractor proposal
Comprehensive Research Plan
A $30M blueprint for turning alleged anomalous cognition into a research and intelligence program.
Decode →File 0021983
Army analytical memo
Analysis of the Gateway Process
A model of altered attention that combines practical exercises with highly speculative physics.
Decode →File P011993
Program decision memo
Project STARGATE Executive Summary
A budget-and-policy snapshot recommending that the existing appropriation be spent as planned.
Decode →01
Research architecture
7 June 1991 · SAIC → DIA
A proposal to operationalize alleged anomalous cognition.
SAIC proposed a five-year, 175 person-year program costing about $30 million: select and train “receivers,” standardize blind sessions, score responses, test applications, and route any surviving output into ordinary human workflows.
Established by the record
The plan existed.
Authentic proposal · named authors · date · recipient · budgetAsserted by its authors
An anomaly existed.
Interesting claim · incomplete mechanism · contractor incentiveLater operational finding
Utility did not hold.
1995 review: inconsistent, ambiguous, not warranted for intelligence use02
Gateway decoded
9 June 1983 · U.S. Army Operational Group
Use the attention protocol. Test the rest.
Wayne M. McDonnell’s memo analyzes the Monroe Institute’s Gateway Experience. It combines relaxation, sound, visualization, and self-observation with a speculative account of consciousness, holograms, time, and the “Absolute.”
Operational layer
Observable and testable
- attention setting
- relaxation
- expectation logging
- independent notes
- post-session comparison
Theory layer
Unverified in this record
- out-of-body travel
- past or future access
- healing claims
- universal energy fields
- holographic cosmology
Operational translation
Six moves the fleet can actually test.
We preserve the exercise, strip away implied certainty, and add a measurable failure condition.
Energy conversion box
Write down distractions, risks, and expectations before the session. Park them; do not erase them.
Resonant tuning
Use 60–90 seconds of comfortable paced exhaling or humming. Audio is optional; no medical claim is implied.
Focus 10
Translate “mind awake / body asleep” into a short body scan: physically settled, mentally attentive.
Focus 12
Open attention, then record raw impressions before interpretation. Keep nouns and explanations in a separate field.
Problem solving
State one concrete question in advance. Record the predicted next action and what would count as failure.
Self-knowledge
Log confidence, mood, expectations, and misses. The observer is part of the measurement system.
Archive note
The official CIA scan skips report page 25. A Monroe Institute copy reported in 2021 supplies a candidate page, but that recovery has secondary—not CIA—provenance.
03
Program layer
30 August 1993 · DDR&E → USD(A)
STARGATE, as a program decision—not a legend.
The memo summarizes congressional funding, contractor concentration, DIA staffing, and three continuation choices. It recommends no change: finish the work supported by the existing appropriation.
Congressional-add history
The memo describes survival through episodic adds, not a smooth program ramp.
FY86–89$6.35MArmy
FY90$0Congressional add
FY91$2MCongressional add
FY92$2MCongressional add
FY93$0Congressional add
FY94$0Budget request
Internet archive finding
The linked file is the complete indexed executive summary—not the full STARGATE dossier.
Its two-page object is a fax cover plus decision memo. The “full original” program record is not one longer version of this memo; it is the CIA’s STARGATE collection.
1993 executive summary
↗The exact two-page record supplied here: fax cover plus decision memo.
Full CIA STARGATE collection
↗The program corpus. Use this—not one memo—as the archive boundary.
Standard remote-viewing procedures
↗A primary methods document for reconstructing what operators were asked to do.
SRI program review
↗A program-era source for claims, protocols, and internal framing.
1995 independent evaluation
↗The later operational review that found continued intelligence use unwarranted.
04
Fleet protocol
Recursive learning · 12 minutes per loop
Coordinate without manufacturing consensus.
One person protects the target, one records impressions, one attacks the inference, and one preserves the audit trail. Repeat the loop to improve the protocol—not to turn repetition into proof.
Frame
Define the question and failure condition.
Separate
Label source, observation, and inference.
Blind
Keep target information from the observer.
Compare
Reveal only after every note is locked.
Update
Change one protocol variable at a time.
Publish
Release misses, uncertainty, and provenance.
Local field console
Run one auditable loop.
Nothing entered here is uploaded or shared. Copy the locked packet into your community’s own record.
Frame
01:00Source Keeper assigns an opaque target ID and defines the failure condition.
Editable until lock
05
Cross-file synthesis
The record changes shape over time.
Gateway analysis
A training theory and proposed altered-attention model.
Research plan
A contractor blueprint for selection, testing, and operations.
STARGATE memo
A funding and continuation decision inside government.
Independent review
A negative verdict on continued operational intelligence use.
Public archive
Declassification makes provenance inspectable; it does not validate the claims.
Primary archive
Follow the record outward.
Start with the exact file, then move to adjacent methods, budgets, reviews, and the full program collection. Preserve object type at every step.
RecordArchive identifierObjectUsed here for
1991 research planCIA-RDP96-00789R003100080001-9Contractor proposalScope + budget →Gateway analysisCIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5Army memoModel + exercises →STARGATE summaryCIA-RDP96-00789R002500240008-1Decision memoFunding + options →1995 evaluationCIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5Independent reviewOperational verdict →Mirror integrity · 59 pages · 3,636,195 bytes · SHA-256 53b9083a506c…2604 · Full digest and evidence boundaries are published in the JSON manifest.